Metatron’s
Cube

Now
Paradox was simultaneously inside and outside of itself.

And in
this conceptualization, It became two connected parallel cubes, a cubic
prism, known as a tesseract

**,**as the forth Euclidean dimension came into being (the w axis).
And in so
doing, a Kinder came into being, a god of mathematics known as Sacred Geometry,
called Metatron.

Thusly,
the White Cube Stones became known as Metatron’s Cube.

Ah,
Paradox! Infinity cannot exist. Without time, without the concept of time and
perception, there is no such thing as infinity.
Within time, within the concept of time and perception, infinity is
finite and thus limited! Infinity is
impossible! Yet it is. Take off your ring and find the
beginning. Find the end. There is none. The ring is infinite. Infinity is circular, not just in form, but
in concept as well. It is circular
logic. Thus, the whole idea of a ray beaming
towards infinity is flawed. Yes, the ray
goes on forever, but only if the concept of forever doesn’t exist!

These
White Cube Stones, these “infinite cubes” were Paradox, and were thusly aware
of the concept of the inner walls, and the outer walls. Despite its infinity, Paradox was thus still
finite.

And in these different perspectives, inside as
inside, inside as outside, outside as outside, and outside as inside, in this
awareness of Objectivity and Subjectivity, of Superposition and Decoherence,
the Qliphoth was born.

Consequently,
the Metatron’s Cube, in being both within and without, turned Itself inside
out, and the interior surfaces became the exterior surfaces, again and again,
swallowing itself for infinity.

Image
Reference: 10

Metatron’s
Cube is made by drawing 13 Spheres, arranged with geometrical precision, by
dividing the center sphere equally into 6 parts, mimicking the symbol for soul,
and expanding outwards through the centers of 2 rings of 6 spheres each. These Spheres represents the 12 Spheres of
the Suturian Trees plus the center, Ain, Void.

Within
this image one can see hexagrams, as well as the cube within a cube, the 3D
representation of a tesseract.

The
outside of the Outer Cube represents Archetype A.) Positive White Cube Stone of
Infinite Expansion. (TOL).

The inside
of the Inner Cube represents Archetype B.) Negative White Cube Stone of
Infinite Contraction. (TOK).

Just as a
right hand glove can be flipped inside out and now fit the left hand, via the
forth dimension, the cubes of the tesseract can rotate onto their
mirror-images, but “in this rotation, the interior surfaces are converted to
exterior”.

^{11}
Thus, the inside
of the Outer Cube represents Archetype C.)Qliphothic Positive White Cube Stone
of Finite Expansion (The Positive Black Cube Stone) (QTOL)

The
outside of the Inner Cube represents Archetype D.) Qliphothic Negative White
Cube Stone of Finite Contraction (The Negative Black Cube Stone) (QTOK)

Ah!
Subjectivity! Is the inside-out,
right-hand glove now a left-hand glove, or is it simply an inside-out
right-hand glove mimicking a left-hand glove?
You decide!

The
tesseract symbolically unfolds, within three dimensional space, into eight
cubes, traditionally appearing as a four-armed cubic cross, wherein the central
cube is obscured. I have adjusted the
image by sliding down two of the arms to create an inverted cross, to further
reflect the concept of Metatron’s Cube.

Each side
represents one of the Four Suturian Rosy Crosses. The top and bottom view of the Cube Cross,
that which is not colored in the following illustrations, represents the
transitional states.

Each of
the eight cubes are facets of the Godhead.
They may be thought of as the Eight Consciousnesses: consciousness in
the five senses, thought-consciousness, self-consciousness, and
unconsciousness-’consciousness’ or perhaps the Ogdoad, the eight primordial
deities of creation of Ancient Egyptian Mythology.

On Nuit
& Hadit

Back to
the idea that Hadit mimics Nuit, but is not the reflection of Nuit.

When
looking into a mirror, it is the z axis, depth, that is inverted. Hadit exist on the w axis, the axis of the fourth
dimension. Thus, Hadit is not the
reflection of Nuit.

In normal
reality, the z axis consist of two halves, which I shall call a and b. Thus, in normal reality, the z axis is a + b.

When
looking into a mirror, ½ of the z axis (b) is replaced with a duplicate
(inverted) of the other ½ of the z axis (a).
Thus the z axis becomes a + -a.

In normal
reality, the w axis consists of two halves, which I shall call c and d. Thus, in normal reality, the w axis is c + d.

Nuit is
only ½ of w (c), and Hadit is the other ½ of w (d). c + d = the w axis.

So what
the hell happens if there is a “mirror” that reflects w?

When
looking into this mirror, ½ of the w axis (d) is replaced with a duplicate
(inverted) of the other ½ of the w axis (c).
Thus the w axis, rather than being c + d, becomes c + -c. Or Tree of Life + Qliphothic Tree of
Life. Thus, Hadit cannot be the
reflection of Nuit.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment